From: Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@...>
Date: 2006-06-17T00:23:13+09:00
Subject: Re: Why the lack of mixing-in support for Class methods?

transfire@gmail.com wrote:
> Daniel Schierbeck wrote:
>> ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
>>>> If 'class_extension' affects modules as well, do you think of any more
>>>> generic name, in place of "class" extension?
>>>   singleton_methods &block
>> Except it's not restricted to methods. Here's a couple of spinoffs:
>>
>>    * singleton_module
>>    * singleton_extension
>>
> 
> Eeek! Please, no "singleton". Anything but "singleton".

`beer_module'?