From: Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10@...>
Date: 2006-06-14T22:35:35+09:00
Subject: Re: Cut-based AOP

------=_Part_5694_7755386.1150292129022
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

>>>Well, saying that is sort-of like programming Turbo Pascal in the 80's
and saying "I have yet to need OOP". AOP is not just a little side
utility, it's a whole new angle on coding. <<<

I'm looking for ways to put *harder* shells around pieces of well-tested and
well-designed functionality, not for ways to slice them open even more. The
article you cite makes a big deal out of "loose-coupling" (the buzzword of
the decade) as a goal for AOP. I'd rather accomplish that with asynchronous
messaging.

Austin is right, we don't need AOP.

------=_Part_5694_7755386.1150292129022--