From: Son SonOfLilit Date: 2006-06-13T16:38:30+09:00 Subject: Ruby as a kernel? ------=_Part_66880_6151230.1150184292817 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline This forks out of the "Ruby's role in future OSs" thread, since it deals with something completely different than the discussed there. When someone suggested a ruby-based kernel, he was responded by "that'd be taking things too far". Well, if we consider Moore's law and YAMV, I think it isn't. I know a ruby kernel would be a desperate effort to continue the M$ policy of making OSs make up for changes in computer speed and beat Moore, who works for a competitor ( :P ) but still, the advantages would be well worth it (depending on ruby being at par with Java regarding speed): Development time of apps for an OS who's native API is ruby dinamic objects would go drastically down. Drastically. It's like developers choosing to use ruby today even though it's much slower than C, since their time is worth more than CPU time. Remember how much better ruby itself would be in a system that would not demand it to interface with un-OOP stuff all the time (which I feel the most dirty when I do in ruby - it's just not right to output a file when you have everything as objects). Such an OS would be naturally reflective, a feature that would make the world (and especially the business world) a far better and more productive place. Everything in such a system would be interdependent is a way that would make customization a breaze - mixins would provide, for example, natural handling of "file types" - you just extend the type object to do the services you want. Ruby is almost ready: it has natural threading and natural object security. It only needs /better/ natural object permissions, transparent saving of the environment on disk and a natural GUI that is done the-Ruby-way (tm)(r)(c). A way to load C extentions from within ruby in runtime (I mean, write C code in a ruby text editor, invoke gcc from the editor and dinamically load the resulting .so) would help, too, and it's almost possible (well, it is, but not as simple as it should be). From there it would be a matter of months to create an OS that uses a linux kernel for bootstrap, memory management, basic disk i/o and networking and ruby for /everything/ else. Such a system could be programmed easily from within itself using, say VMWare. Why is it too much? ------=_Part_66880_6151230.1150184292817--