From: Ross Bamford Date: 2006-06-10T03:52:37+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby's role in future operating systems On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 02:54 +0900, James Britt wrote: > Question (maybe a bit off-topic): > > The example may be quick, but in what way is it dirty? Personally, I tend to use 'quick and dirty' when I really mean 'only-lightly-tested'. As in: "Here's a solution that seems to work" rather than just "Here's a solution". Also, a lot of scripts I write for myself are 'quick and dirty'. Mostly they work, but I don't actually remember _how_ with all of them :) -- Ross Bamford - rosco@roscopeco.REMOVE.co.uk