From: Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>
Date: 2006-06-09T11:37:09+09:00
Subject: Re: Why the lack of mixing-in support for Class methods?

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: Why the lack of mixing-in support for Class methods?"
>     on Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:22:55 +0900, transfire@gmail.com writes:
> 
> |Considering the above (which by the way should also have an 'include
> |Beanable'), a notation that has some similarity and is available for
> |use:
> |
> |   class Beanbag
> |     self << Beanable
> |   end
> 
> I like this more than others, but I worry about that this is less
> descriptive than other at the same time.  For example, how one can
> know whether "include" does not injects module methods, where "<<"
> does.


     class Beanbag
       include! Beanable
     end


;)

Hal