From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2006-06-09T11:25:53+09:00
Subject: Re: Why the lack of mixing-in support for Class methods?

Hi,

In message "Re: Why the lack of mixing-in support for Class methods?"
    on Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:22:55 +0900, transfire@gmail.com writes:

|Considering the above (which by the way should also have an 'include
|Beanable'), a notation that has some similarity and is available for
|use:
|
|   class Beanbag
|     self << Beanable
|   end

I like this more than others, but I worry about that this is less
descriptive than other at the same time.  For example, how one can
know whether "include" does not injects module methods, where "<<"
does.

							matz.