From: Bill Kelly <billk@...>
Date: 2006-06-09T09:08:54+09:00
Subject: Re: Why the lack of mixing-in support for Class methods?

From: "Bill Guindon" <agorilla@gmail.com>
>
> On 6/8/06, Elliot Temple <curi@curi.us> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Alex Young wrote:
>>
>> > Alder Green wrote:
>> >> On 6/8/06, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> ...
>> >>> No, I don't have a better name. I thought of #blend, but that's just
>> >>> too ... ugly.
>> >> I like #blend. Goes well with #blend? etc.
>> >> Some other nice alternatives from the thesaurus: meld, merge, mingle,
>> >> fuse, combine, integrate, compound.
>> > A few others:
>> >
>> > derive (a little obscure)
>> > evolve (I quite like that)
>>
>> evolve seems vague and makes people think of monkeys
> 
> What's wrong with that? ;)
> 
> Ok, now I have to toss some out...
> 
> engulf (seems bigger than include or extend)
> completes (give me the complete list of methods)
> clobber (silly, but it's likely to do that to some methods, and has
> CLass/OBject mnemonic).

enchant ?  enliven ?  enfold ?  incorporate ?  induct ?  ;)

What about import ?


Regards,

Bill