From: Sy Ali <sy1234@...>
Date: 2006-06-09T01:12:40+09:00
Subject: Re: pausing until a character is received

On 6/8/06, Dave Burt <dave@burt.id.au> wrote:
> Interesting... it appears no trap's necessary on Windows if you're using
> _getch.

This keeps things simple.  Nice.


> You can use ?\cC instead of 3.

I'll use that directly, but I'm not sure which would be preferred.
Either choice might not be entirely portable.


> Your trap isn't being added until it's too late. While you're in
> read_char, Windows' _getch function will return 3 rather than be
> interrupted, so that works fine anyway.

I'll get around to the trapping stuff when the time comes, but I
figured it was something simple like not adding it in the right order.
 Making my first unit tests challenged me the same way.  =)


Thanks for everything.