From: "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>
Date: 2006-06-04T19:30:38+09:00
Subject: Re: FasterCSV RCR?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I started thinking that just csv.rb should be faster.

James Edward Gray II wrote:
> method arguments, we could get pretty close to perfect, but CSV does
> some odd things like confuse open() with foreach() that I chose to avoid
> in FasterCSV.  Because of that, I can't always be sure what to do when

Can you please explain what are "odd"?  FasterCSV.build_csv_interface
seems to be a simple delegator.

> 2.  We could drop compatibility and rename FasterCSV to CSV.  This way
> people get all the good stuff where they expect it.  However, this would

Can you please explain what are "good"?  I'll introduce those features
into csv.rb.  Do those features depend on faster_csv.rb specific behavior?

Regards,
// NaHi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)

iQEVAwUBRIK2Bh9L2jg5EEGlAQJzbwgAxbK3zt4fLKPMmsADi72pYSz17dsFMuCM
6mshzj7oFzPzLdnefBJLqCRX7ixZXKzbC5KIZ2U79uiT8lFMLy5/r6NuUbwl2Moj
+n28chcdW2NF3MvJ16crI+WMD3OOuivtVKDxOt38wxT/r6iW4BCbV7Xt7FKYJAsN
eFgguVkeaVBljtEGtL6kkUTjgiOD8htCnAJVbxUpVQwRrX5AjhzJoogLHb03OOfX
EFJ4S5Nm2sQy/wcIX6JZued3pytIh6jEZtp3Nz3xY/Ca61aQB6xMPjk99MTN2pqR
hx8xF4/G7I45hjC3gMQLcEfhHNtcAzfYfDO/DU45pg0K3uLMLQxkJg==
=mnFD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----