From: Alex Young <alex@...>
Date: 2006-06-03T18:08:02+09:00
Subject: Re: Another Look at Namespaces

transfire@gmail.com wrote:
> Had a "light-bulb" over head moment and threw this together as a simple
> demonstration. It's prerry neat. THough is stffes from a few problems
> of course 1) it probaby not very efficient 2) literal notions don't
> work and 3) it's not dynamic. #3 could be solved if there were a way to
> capture const_missing relative to a specific module/class (no
> inheritance chain).  #2 requires Ruby itself to look for, say String
> class relatively instad of absolutely (potentially dnagerous?) of
> course #1 is just one of this things ;-)
> 

<snip code>

When you say "literals don't work", what do you mean?

I get this:

irb(main):048:0> x.show
#=> [X, X::Kernel, Object, Kernel]
#=> "Hello"
#=> "Hello!!!!!"
=> nil

What are you expecting?

-- 
Alex