From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2006-05-31T10:24:06+09:00
Subject: Re: FasterCSV RCR?

Hi,

In message "Re: FasterCSV RCR?"
    on Wed, 31 May 2006 09:34:32 +0900, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov writes:

|i know matz is against it, but i really think we should have both.  we have
|
|   ftools and fileutils
|
|   date and date2
|
|   getoptlong, getopts, parsearg, and optparse
|
|   monitor, mutex, and sync
|
|   runit and test/unit
|
|and so on.

They are the mistakes that I try to avoid making again.

|   ftools and fileutils
|   getoptlong, getopts, parsearg, and optparse

They are unfortunate mistakes I (we) made.

|   date and date2

date2 = date + extra libraries.

|   monitor, mutex, and sync

They are (somewhat) different.

|   runit and test/unit

runit is a compatibility library based on test/unit.

							matz.