From: Tim Becker <a2800276@...>
Date: 2006-05-23T00:56:12+09:00
Subject: Re: Writing a interpreter extension

> The use case can't be changed, it would need to be secure code...

Then the prerequisite would be secure hardware. It's not possible to
safely encrypt code purely in software.

You've not explained why you think that code hidden inside a compiled
binary is safe. It might be just a tad more difficult to extract than
from a script, but it doesn't make sense to distinguish between sorta
safe and a little bit more safe.

Maybe you need to describe the `use case ` in more detail.

   -tim