From: uncutstone wu <uncutstone@...>
Date: 2006-05-19T12:25:29+09:00
Subject: Re: Make a revised version of design patterns in ruby

Jim Weirich wrote:
> The way I understood the examle is that "create_something" IS the 
> client.  It gets passed the abstract factory (parameter named factory) 
> and is actually shielded from the concrete class of the factory.  The 
> example is confusing in that the client immediately passes the created 
> object to the calling context (which is where the concrete factory is 
> know), but the comments seem to make it clear the intention of the 
> author.

Ah, it seems I misunderstood something. I think the name 
"create_something" fools me , it sounds like a factory method. Sorry.
I suggest the author changes the name .

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.