From: Daniel Schierbeck Date: 2006-05-18T23:55:36+09:00 Subject: Rescue clauses on do/end blocks? I know this has been on the table before, but I really see no reason not to allow do/end blocks to have rescue clauses on them, i.e. foo do bar rescue baz end and even foo do bar rescue baz ensure bur end These would be equivalent to foo do begin bar rescue baz ensure bur end end When an ensure clause is added, the expression evaluated therein will always be the return value of a call to the block -- just as if there was a begin/end block inside the do/end block. This wouldn't offer any new functionality, but would make the use of rescue and ensure clauses more consistent -- currently they work with begin, class, and def blocks (more?). There's of course the case of the curly bracket block syntax, but I see no need to support it there -- I think it's most commonly used with one-liners, where rescuing may be overkill. I'd like some feedback, and if its generally positive, I'll post an RCR. Cheers, Daniel