From: uncutstone wu <uncutstone@...>
Date: 2006-05-18T02:16:06+09:00
Subject: Re: Capturing stdout

Mark Volkmann wrote:
> Here's another alternative.
> 
>   # Create a string object to receive the output.
>   dest = ''
> 
>   # Add a write method to this string object.
>   def dest.write(data); self << data; end
> 
>   old_stdout, $stdout = $stdout, dest
> 
>   # Invoke code that uses puts.
> 
>   # Restore stdout.
>   $stdout = old_stdout

I think this is what duck type means. It's really a good example of duck 
type, isn't it?

Best regards.

uncutstone


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.