From: Ross Bamford Date: 2006-05-11T16:39:54+09:00 Subject: Re: Compiler for Ruby On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 23:53 +0900, Logan Capaldo wrote: > On May 10, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Jamal Mazrui wrote: > > > Thanks for the links. After reviewing several web pages, I have a few > > more questions at this time. > > > > Can YARV be used to speed up Ruby 1.84 programs for Windows? Is > > YARV on > > a separate track from Rite, or an integral part of its strategy for > > better performance? Is Rite a code name for Ruby 2.0, or will it > > be the > > proper name upon official release of the language, with Ruby being the > > name for earlier versions instead? (I hope not, since I like the name > > Ruby and hope it will continue, either with or without Rite in > > addition.). > > > > Jamal > > > > > > ack, top-posting evil! > > anyway, I believe that YARV is the planned VM for Rite. Ruby 2.0 is > the name of the language, rite is the name of the C implementation of > Ruby 2.0 IIRC. Indeed, the Ruby name doesn't appear to be endangered: $ ruby-yarv -v ruby 2.0.0 (Base: Ruby 1.9.0 2006-04-08) [i686-linux] YARVCore 0.4.0 Rev: 493 (2006-05-03) [opts: ] -- Ross Bamford - rosco@roscopeco.REMOVE.co.uk