From: Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
Date: 2006-05-10T20:27:32+09:00
Subject: Re: Simplifying Vim folding

On 5/10/06, Doug Kearns <dougkearns@gmail.com> wrote:> G'day folks,>> I was planning on simplifying the default folding provided when> foldmethod=syntax.>> Currently pretty much everything is folded but I was planning on> reducing this to just module/class/method definitions, multi-line> comments and __END__ data chunks, with an option to disable comment> folding.>> We could, of course, make this 'infinitely' configurable but I see> little point. Is anyone particularly enamoured with having their> multi-line regexes folded? ;-)
Enamoured? No. But there are things that I really like being folded --multi-line hash definitions (I wish it extended to multiline arraydefinitions).
All in all, I'm mostly happy with the state of folding in the folding.
This probably makes me unusual, but I'd much rather keep my cases andif statements foldable. If it's changed in the "official"distribution, I will need to pretty much stop upgrading because methodfolding is too coarse for me.
-austin--Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com               * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca