From: "Jason D. Clinton" Date: 2006-05-09T03:48:49+09:00 Subject: Re: adwords4: access the Google Adwords API in ruby --=-MU6KZ+bSJM/LZG+NcqL9 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-kGr7kT02AnBezy2hv3oP" --=-kGr7kT02AnBezy2hv3oP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 02:31 +0900, Stefano Taschini wrote: > The webpage that you linked only seems to complain that it is more > difficult for the debian packagers to redistribute ruby packages as > debs, which does not exactly mean that "Using gems on Linux is > considered an evil." No, you misread the page, then. It's only more difficult when an author chooses only to provide a Gems method. That's what that entire page is about. --=-kGr7kT02AnBezy2hv3oP Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 02:31 +0900, Stefano Taschini wrote:
The webpage that you linked only seems to complain =
that it is more
difficult for the debian packagers to redistribute =
ruby packages as
debs, which does not exactly mean that "Using =
gems on Linux is
considered an evil."

No, you misread the page, then. It's only more difficult when an author cho= oses only to provide a Gems method. That's what that entire page is about.<= BR>
--=-kGr7kT02AnBezy2hv3oP-- --=-MU6KZ+bSJM/LZG+NcqL9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEX5JvtSqjk42zvwkRAvARAJ0ZbX5q9N7WLZFqT9fn7PXJ/tm78QCgyZFP FAKkaQqunxicNFj2nu4z6FA= =PGZe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MU6KZ+bSJM/LZG+NcqL9--