From: Jason Clinton Date: 2006-05-09T03:34:26+09:00 Subject: Re: adwords4: access the Google Adwords API in ruby --=-dXa+u8++603Upx8fuGbT Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-zwlXnga+q9fS8dfqw54T" --=-zwlXnga+q9fS8dfqw54T Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 01:51 +0900, Logan Capaldo wrote: > OTOH, I do believe that user applications probably should not be =20 > distributed as gems, or at least not only as gems. But that's another =20 > topic, with other reasoning. That's the only topic of any imporantance here. Applications depend on libraries. Debian (or anyone else) cannot track and meet depends if the libraries are _only_ available as Gems. All that they are asking for is that both methods be equally maintained. --=-zwlXnga+q9fS8dfqw54T Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 01:51 +0900, Logan Capaldo wrote:
OTOH, I do believe that user applications probably =
should not be  
distributed as gems, or at least not only as gems. =
But that's another  
topic, with other reasoning.

That's the only topic of any imporantance here. Applications depend on libr= aries. Debian (or anyone else) cannot track and meet depends if the librari= es are _only_ available as Gems. All that they are asking for is that both = methods be equally maintained. --=-zwlXnga+q9fS8dfqw54T-- --=-dXa+u8++603Upx8fuGbT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEX48NtSqjk42zvwkRAqb/AJ4iBN1Va+y2c4WCYzViBCL29692ngCgsXrl KUwygqjmRLuVuZ9S0ioS2O0= =7GeU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dXa+u8++603Upx8fuGbT--