From: Minkoo Seo <minkoo.seo@...>
Date: 2006-05-06T18:13:55+09:00
Subject: Re: What do you say to log2 to Math module?

------=_Part_17776_31064114.1146906832328
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Thank you for your time and effort!!

Sincerely,
Minkoo Seo


On 5/5/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: What do you say to log2 to Math module?"
>    on Fri, 5 May 2006 09:34:44 +0900, Tanaka Akira <akr@m17n.org> writes:
>
> |I guess it is easy to persuade matz because log2 is defined
> |by C99 and POSIX.
>
> Right.  And I did it last night.  Although gcc gives me warning
> "incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'log2'" unless
> I specify -std=3Dc99.
>
>                                                        matz.
>
>

------=_Part_17776_31064114.1146906832328--