From: chiaro scuro <kiaroskuro@...>
Date: 2006-05-02T08:15:57+09:00
Subject: Re: from block to code (also: how to get the bindings of a block)

------=_Part_22451_26674955.1146525354507
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

If it works, it's brilliant!

On 5/2/06, Logan Capaldo <logancapaldo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2006, at 4:30 PM, chiaro scuro wrote:
>
> > On 4/30/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Apr 27, 2006, at 12:35 AM, chiaro scuro wrote:
> >>
> >> > Does anyone know how to convert a block to a string
> >> representation of
> >> > the code it contains?
> >>
> >> lib/r2chacks.rb in ZenHacks has this.
> >
> >
> > I'll check it out thanks.
> >
> >
> > If you need the bindings from a proc you are probably trying to solve
> >> the wrong problem.
> >
> >
> > I would normally agree with you, but this is not a design problem or a
> > domain-conceptualization problem.
> >
> > It's a language-twisting problem that imposes otherwise unimportant
> > constraints on what I can and cannot do.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chiaroscuro
> > ---
> > Liquid Development: http://liquiddevelopment.blogspot.com/
>
> I dunno know about the binding (maybe you can use method_missing +
> Binding.of_caller)
>
> but one to get the code (well the ast, which is pretty darn close) is
> do something like:
> require 'parse_tree'
>
> def recipe(name, &blk)
>     class A; end
>     A.class_eval { define_method(:code, &blk) }
>     pt =3D  ParseTree.new
>     sexprs =3D pt.parse_tree(A)
> end
>
>
>


--
Chiaroscuro
---
Liquid Development: http://liquiddevelopment.blogspot.com/

------=_Part_22451_26674955.1146525354507--