From: chiaro scuro Date: 2006-05-02T05:11:41+09:00 Subject: Re: from block to code (also: how to get the bindings of a block) ------=_Part_18737_13310549.1146514297904 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 5/1/06, Jacob Fugal wrote: > > On 5/1/06, chiaro scuro wrote: > > I need to keep the equal signs. > > This is my big question; why do you need the equal signs? I see > nothing inherent about the "recipe" domain that makes the equal signs > necessary or even desirable. If you were willing to ditch them, a > whole slew of simpler and cleaner implementations are available. > > Jacob Fugal > > I realize that would make it much easier in ruby. It's just that the equal signs make lots of sense to my DSL users. (forget the recipes, it's just an example) Look, it's not a matter of life or death. *of course* I can do without if there is no alternative. (eventually I did find a solution to this -although it's a cheesy one- but = I am not saying yet ;-) It just bothers me that I cannot access that context if I need to, and in this case I do. -- Chiaroscuro --- Liquid Development: http://liquiddevelopment.blogspot.com/ ------=_Part_18737_13310549.1146514297904--