From: Robert Dober <robert.dober@...>
Date: 2006-04-22T04:49:54+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby, Constants, and the real world

------=_Part_1502_26426633.1145648990288
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 4/21/06, pat eyler <pat.eyler@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For as much flack as Ruby takes for having constants which can be
> changed, I was amused to find this aritcle:
>
>
> http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9033-another-fundamental-constant-a=
ccused-of-changing.html
>
> posted at slashdot.  The headline is:  Another fundamental constant
> accused of changing
>
> Maybe Ruby's got the right approach after all, huh?


mu is *not* a constant, Mu is ;) and of course ruby is right what did you
think?

Cheers
Robert

--
> thanks,
> -pate
> -------------------------
> http://on-ruby.blogspot.com
>
>


--
Deux choses sont infinies : l'univers et la b=EAtise humaine ; en ce qui
concerne l'univers, je n'en ai pas acquis la certitude absolue.

- Albert Einstein

------=_Part_1502_26426633.1145648990288--