From: Robert Dober <robert.dober@...>
Date: 2006-04-14T06:00:49+09:00
Subject: Re: Rubyesque way to do multiple <=>

------=_Part_21935_12854243.1144962046360
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 4/13/06, Victor Shepelev <vshepelev@imho.com.ua> wrote:
>
>
>
> You haven't got it. I already USED first version, but I CAN'T if
> comparison
> is done through stand-alone function instead of <=3D>


I have not, you are right! really sorry, I just *could* not immagine that
someone would implement a Custom Compare without defining <=3D>.
But as it is you have of course a problem.
Forgive my answer sometimes there are beginners posting.
The next time however, before replying, I might read the question.

What you have done is nice, but condider this too in case you can determine
a reasonable BaseClass of sex.

class SexBaseClass
   def <=3D>(other)
      ComplexCompareFunction self, other
   end
end

Hope I got it
Robert

> Cheers
> > Robert
>
> Victor.
>
>
>


--
Deux choses sont infinies : l'univers et la b=EAtise humaine ; en ce qui
concerne l'univers, je n'en ai pas acquis la certitude absolue.

- Albert Einstein

------=_Part_21935_12854243.1144962046360--