From: Tanner Burson Date: 2006-04-13T22:24:43+09:00 Subject: Re: Equivalent of Java static code block in Ruby? ------=_Part_19218_6551246.1144934678042 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 4/13/06, azrael@cream.org wrote: > > > > > > > No, that is what I would expect. Anything else is broken. > > > > > > Martin > > > > True, the statement above was related to the part you deleted > > in your answer. > > > > My apologies; just being a bit trigger happy. I didn't actually know if > it was right, I was just saying that I would expect any other behaviour > broken. > > Still, some clarificatory syntax might not be a bad thing. Perhaps a > > @@do > ...static initializer stuff... > end > > As a suggestion? > > Martin > > Why? Why add MORE syntax to solve a non-problem? This would also requir= e you to put all you attr_* calls in this new syntax, as well as calls to private :method. I vote (as if it would matter ;) ) for documentation bein= g written, not new syntax. -- =3D=3D=3DTanner Burson=3D=3D=3D tanner.burson@gmail.com http://tannerburson.com <---Might even work one day... ------=_Part_19218_6551246.1144934678042--