From: David Vallner Date: 2006-04-13T02:01:59+09:00 Subject: Re: First script seems slow - What's a better way to write t --nextPart2845975.Yl5Sqjy4R3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline D=C5=88a Streda 12. Apr=C3=ADl 2006 18:29 Charlotte nap=C3=ADsal: > Basically, I'm just trying to figure out if it's my fault the script is > slow, or if Ruby just isn't very efficient. > Well, I hate to mention the giant purple squid in the middle of the kitchen= ,=20 but Ruby is... shall we say... not really speedy. I should still outperform= =20 TCL, but not much else, if the programming language benchmarks are to be=20 trusted. (Which they aren't, but hey.) Then again, YARV looks surprisingly vital for what was mere vaporware only = a=20 few years ago, so there's a chance of a Blazing Fast (well, not really) Rub= y=20 yet. David Vallner --nextPart2845975.Yl5Sqjy4R3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEPTJ5+aUhotvmpDgRApJMAJ9RfS1gBCDXv94dIBlYswrNMZHRiwCcD8Qy guBKAVI7lgNTRRgAYcJoTkQ= =l5Ei -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2845975.Yl5Sqjy4R3--