From: Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
Date: 2006-04-07T01:16:32+09:00
Subject: Re: un_include and un_extend

On 4/6/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:> It still sounds like bad manner for the same reason.  Besides it's not> thread safe.  If I were designing Transaction::Simple, I'd create> t_foo as a delegation object to the original foo.  But I might be> still missing something.
That might work and I can investigate that. Ultimately, the trick withthat mode of operation is that changes to the t_foo object *must* bereflected to the foo object, but only if the block exits without erroror an explicit #commit_transaction call is made.
The other thing that would make me happy is the ability to not haveMarshal#dump break if I have a Proc. ;)
-austin--Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com               * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca