From: James Edward Gray II Date: 2006-03-19T12:17:53+09:00 Subject: Re: Core lib clean-up On Mar 18, 2006, at 7:59 PM, James Britt wrote: > Trans wrote: >>> Which is a standard library, not a core class. It shouldn't be in >>> those docs at all. >> Thanks. So there are some issue with the docs themselves. > > One being that people have to know whether something is 'core' or > 'stdlib' when they look for it. I offered my best idea for an improvement to this some time ago on the Ruby Documentation list. Did you not feel building an index page grouped by functionality held any value James? James Edward Gray II