From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2006-03-15T11:33:58+09:00
Subject: Re: Alternate notation for eigenclass

Hi,

In message "Re: Alternate notation for eigenclass"
    on Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:22:22 +0900, dblack@wobblini.net writes:

|Of course all of this may change if the use of classes to implement
|per-object behavior changes.  I think that's why Matz hasn't wanted to
|have a singleton_class method (i.e., it couples the concept to much to
|the implementation).

It was the original reason.  But I changed my mind.  The only reason
we don't have eigenclass (or singleton_class) method is absence of the
best name, which 100% suitable for the concept.

							matz.