From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2001-07-24T14:26:47+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:18406] Re: OO question

Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:18374] OO question"
    on 01/07/24, "Tom Malone" <tom@tom-malone.com> writes:

|Someone please tell me if this is an inappropriate question for this list -
|I don't want to irritate or offend anyone here.
|What is the benefit of a true object-oriented language (Ruby), in which
|everything is an object, as opposed to, say (arbitrarily) a language that is
|not strictly object-oriented (yet is still popular) like Java?

It's easy for my mind.  I hope it's easy for yours too.

							matz.