From: eastcoastcoder@...
Date: 2006-03-10T09:13:42+09:00
Subject: Ruby Namespaces / Modules

If I'm in the middle of module A::B::C, and I want to reference a class
from A::B or from A::B::D, do I need to do ::A::B::Classname (or
::A::B::D::Classname)?

It seems a bit repititous to me.  A module shouldn't need to know it's
ancestors all the way up - just what it needs to use.  Having to keep
track couples modules to a tree and obstructs refactoring.

So, what say the veteran Rubyists?