From: James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Date: 2006-03-08T05:58:13+09:00
Subject: Re: Rio: which is the slow one?

On Mar 7, 2006, at 2:53 PM, rio4ruby wrote:

> Using the standard library's CSV incurs 6x overhead, which seems a bit
> high but is not unreasonable, considering the difference in complexity
> between splitting a string and parsing a CSV line. The CSV module
> could probably be more efficient.

See FasterCSV.  ;)

James Edward Gray II