From: Farrel Lifson <farrel.lifson@...>
Date: 2006-03-07T22:40:05+09:00
Subject: Re: Rescue on do end blocks

Okay that kinda makes sense... kinda.
On 3/7/06, Marcin Miel�y�ski <lopexx@autograf.pl> wrote:> Farrel Lifson wrote:> > Is there some reason why it can't be made more elegant like it is> > currently for methods? Currently you can do this for methods:> >> > def test> >   raise> > rescue> >   puts "Error"> > end> >>> Because do/end is another form of { } (the difference is associativity)> and those are used to compose blocks.>> Imagine:>> sth.each{>     raise>   rescue>     puts "Error"> }>> which doesnt make sense for me>> lopex>>