From: Daniel Harple <dharple@...>
Date: 2006-03-07T22:39:29+09:00
Subject: Re: No documentation for modules on RubyForge?

On Mar 7, 2006, at 2:27 PM, Geoff Lane wrote:

> Along these lines, I've always wondered why 'ri' could not be used  
> for all of the installed modules/gems, etc on the system. There are  
> base install classes (OptionParser, MD5, SOAP::WSDLDriverFactory  
> for example) that don't show anything in 'ri'. I think having one  
> place to turn for documentation is a good idea.

I believe a patch was submitted, and 'ri' documentation generation  
will be included in the next release.

-- Daniel