From: Aaron Becker <aaronbecker17@...>
Date: 2006-03-07T18:50:06+09:00
Subject: Re: No documentation for modules on RubyForge?

------=_Part_1945_137534.1141724991336
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

You're right.  There is documentation there.

However, none of the synopsis examples work on my machines.  Nor are the
require statements shown at the top for the synopsis examples.

How about requiring sample code for all modules?  It would be helpful to
have a complete working example to start with.

After working around a thread starvation issue with Ruby last week, I think
I had a moment of pure frustration with the current state of Ruby.  It show=
s
great promise, but it's frustrating to see little things tarnish it's
potential.

I just started using Ruby in the past couple of weeks and I am very
impressed but also dismayed.  Keep up the excellent work.

hackdaddy


On 3/6/06, Daniel Harple <dharple@generalconsumption.org> wrote:
>
> On Mar 7, 2006, at 6:29 AM, Aaron Becker wrote:
>
> > The same goes for 'reliable/msg'.  It has no documentation.  And it's
> > claimed to be 'stable'???  WTF?
>
> Run gem_server to see documentation for installed gems. reliable-msg
> looks well documented to me.
>
> -- Daniel
>
>

------=_Part_1945_137534.1141724991336--