From: Pit Capitain <pit@...>
Date: 2006-02-25T19:11:59+09:00
Subject: Re: recontextualizing a block (looking for deep magic)

Phil Tomson schrieb:
> 
> The other change I'm considering is hiding the explicit class 
> definition, like so:
> ...
> That would hide a little more 'Rubyness' behind the DSL curtain.

If you want to hide even more of Ruby you could try to get rid of symbols:

   class RHDL
     class << self
       def method_missing(name, *) name end
       def inputs(*args) p [:inputs, *args] end
       def outputs(*args) p [:outputs, *args] end
     end
   end

   Class.new RHDL do
     inputs a, b
     outputs out
   end

   # => [:inputs, :a, :b]
   # => [:outputs, :out]

In reality you'd have to do more than shown here, but I think it could work.

Regards,
Pit