From: Tanner Burson Date: 2006-02-21T13:02:57+09:00 Subject: Re: ANN: Second drop of RubyCLR bridge ------=_Part_12812_31887285.1140494561922 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 2/20/06, John Lam wrote: > > >> Any idea if this will, or will be capable of working with mono? > > I haven't had any cycles to look at mono's implementation of the > DynamicMethod API. If they have feature parity there, then it shouldn't b= e > too hard. That said, that's a secondary goal at the moment, I really want > to > get it to work first on .NET 2.0, and then do a port to mono. Side-by-sid= e > dev would eat up more cycles than I have at the moment. I don't know how far along mono's .NET 2.0 implementation has gotten, but i= t would definitely be interesting to see in the long run. That said, anyone out there want to work in parallel on a mono port? I'd love to, I've just got about nine other projects I need to get done first, so I can't volunteer just yet :) -John > http://www.iunknown.com > > -- =3D=3D=3DTanner Burson=3D=3D=3D tanner.burson@gmail.com http://tannerburson.com <---Might even work one day... ------=_Part_12812_31887285.1140494561922--