From: Bill Kelly <billk@...>
Date: 2001-07-17T01:31:07+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:17938] Re: Rubygarden Poll


From: "Euan Mee" <lucid@users.sourceforge.net>
>
> I've only just joined the list, so didn't vote in the poll.  But as 
> an amateur philologist, I agree with David  (Alan Black, that is)
> 
> Facet is a counterproductive name for a snippet of Ruby-code.
> 
> Can I add my  vote post-facto?  :-)
> 
> The obvious (to me) name for a snippet of Ruby-code would be 
> a 'gem' of Ruby-code.  But then, how many snippets will 
> actually turn out to be gems?  :-)  So snippet it is, I reckon

Hmm, maybe we can classify the non-gems as shards.  ;-)
"This web site has 23 gems and 126 shards of Ruby-code."




(-: Bill