From: Manuel Kasten <kasten.m@...>
Date: 2006-02-09T21:28:22+09:00
Subject: Re: [QUIZ][SOLUTION] Splitting the Loot (#65) (My second attempt)

Adam Shelly wrote:
> On 2/8/06, Manuel Kasten <kasten.m@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>>Adam Shelly wrote:
>>
>>>My turn to say 'Doh!'
>>
>>Yet again. Your new version doesn't split
>>
>>6-ways
>>26 77 26 77 1 39 17 10 90 89 3 20 47 37 51 9 34 15 22 22 94 52
>>
> 
> 
> Aargh.
> How about this one:  here is a replacement splitter function - drop
> into my last submission.
> I added 2 more tests to detect unsplittable sets before I start
> iterating, and I fixed the iterator to be sure it tests every
> combination, and quits as soon as it finds a value which can not fit
> into any fair share.  Oh, and I added one helper to Integer:

It doesn't split (46 69 88 119 130 159 208 233 242 396) 2-ways:

1: 88 119 242 396
2: 46 69 130 159 208 233

Manuel