From: Yukihiro Matsumoto Date: 2006-02-04T15:10:51+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby Syntax: 'initialize' versus 'init' Hi, In message "Re: Ruby Syntax: 'initialize' versus 'init'" on Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:50:11 +0900, Clint Checketts writes: |Am I missing any major reasoning behind using the term 'initialize'? |(Besides the fact that is is the status quo) It can be very critical when the name of initializing method conflicts with others, so that I chose "initialize" to avoid potential problems. Besides that, the name was derived from T language (Scheme dialect). matz.