From: Eric Hodel Date: 2006-02-03T06:54:58+09:00 Subject: Re: The Seattle Brigade Chats with Bruce Eckel On Feb 1, 2006, at 1:39 PM, Robert Klemme wrote: > Phil Tomson wrote: >> In article <43DA42DD.4030907@neurogami.com>, >> James Britt wrote: >>> Quite impressive. >>> >>> http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=146091 >> >> Wow. Kudos to the Seattle.rb folks. It's great when you can move >> someone from the "biased against you" camp into the "gee, the >> language has some interesting features" camp. > > Definitely. Although I have to admit that I find the selection of > features Bruce chose a bit strange. Although he mentions blocks this > would rather be something I had at the top of my list. Anyway, > let's see > how this develops. Bruce and I spent a ton of time on blocks including syntax and use. We didn't go over much ruby code, so I don't think he's had enough exposure to blocks to see how they're commonly used. It didn't come across in the writeup very well, but blocks was something Bruce wanted lots of information on. -- Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://segment7.net This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant http://trackmap.robotcoop.com