From: "Serdar Kılıç" <skilic@...>
Date: 2006-02-02T09:20:46+09:00
Subject: Re: Indentation vs. "end"s

Honestly, I prefer ENDs to indentation, I prefer curly braces to ENDs.
But how about something like this:
def foo
 @var
}

On 02/02/06, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/02/06, Rubyist <nuby.ruby.programmer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> What would be even better would be to allow optional labels after end
> > >> statements, such as "end class", "end def", so the parser can catch
> > >> more errors.
> > That sound like a good idea. But what about "if", "when", "for",
> > "until" etc?
> > Hmm...
> > "endif", "end when", "end for", "end until", "end class", "enddef",...
> > Umh! A never "ended" nightmare.
>
> I'm not particularly fond of IF ... ENDIF constructs, but one can simulate this:
>
>   def foo
>     ...
>   end # def foo
>
> I don't do it, though. Vim does a damn fine job of folding things for me.
>
> -austin
> --
> Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
>                * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca
>
>


--
Cheers,
Serdar Kilic
http://weblog.kilic.net/