From: Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>
Date: 2006-02-01T11:07:09+09:00
Subject: Re: memoize (reposting via ML)

MenTaLguY wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 10:22 +0900, Hal Fulton wrote:
> 
>>This doesn't work for me. I see no measurable speed difference in these
>>three cases. What am I doing wrong?
> 
> 
> It may be that (relative to the overhead of method calls, etc), the
> calculation is less expensive than you suppose.

C'est possible... but with the silly hash-based implementation in
TRW1, I saw a significant speedup of this same function. And
memoize is not *so* complicated...

James Edward Gray, are you listening? Don't you have a memoize of
your own? What does it do with this function?


Cheers,
Hal