From: Alex Polite <notmyprivateemail@...>
Date: 2006-01-29T19:09:14+09:00
Subject: Re: nil != []

On 1/28/06, Stefan Walk <stefan.walk@gmail.com> wrote:
> When you get used to it, it's quite handy. Some methods return integers,
> and false values on failures. If 0 was false, you'd have to distinguish
> between 0 and false/nil when checking for success.

yeah. that makes sense.

alex

--
Alex Polite
http://flosspick.org - finding the right open source