From: MenTaLguY Date: 2006-01-29T06:57:54+09:00 Subject: Re: nil != [] On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 06:39 +0900, Alex Polite wrote: > Well I do understand that it's a convention. They same is true for a > lot of things. Like the positioning of gas and break pedals in cars. > It's just a convention. But when GM puts a new car in the market they > don't swap them. My question is why the constructors of Ruby did? > alex Among other things, it makes things like ||= much more useful. -mental