From: James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Date: 2006-01-26T04:23:31+09:00
Subject: Re: Rethinking Memoization

On Jan 25, 2006, at 12:55 PM, Robert Klemme wrote:

> So, basically I prefer Daniel's simpler approach - especially since
> you can achieve the same: just create an instance that contains all
> code (either directly or by delegation) that is expected to be slow
> (and thus should be memoized) and memoize on that class.

Can you show an example or two here?  Using the current memoize.rb,  
how do we get objects A, B, and C using the same cache?  I guess I'm  
having trouble getting my head around it.

Thanks.

James Edward Gray II