From: Mage <mage@...>
Date: 2006-01-25T21:50:45+09:00
Subject: Re: threading sync

Robert Klemme wrote:

>
>In your case you probably better use a Queue which saves you the
>synchronization overhead (the Queue does it internally). Something along
>the lines of this (untested):
>  
>
Thank you. I see.

However, in cases when there is no existing solution, should I write a 
tester unit that determines about a method its atomicness?

       Mage