From: gwtmp01@...
Date: 2006-01-10T00:35:46+09:00
Subject: Re: "Living Dangerous" stage 2, summarizing ideas


On Jan 9, 2006, at 5:18 AM, zimbatm wrote:
> It seems to me that you forgot two cases where ruby's open nature  
> is an
> inconvenient. Due to ruby's open-class and lack of contraints, it  
> seems
> to me that you can't trust ruby code right away. You can't execute an
> external code in your application in a specific boundary. You can't
> trust it to be "evil" without reviewing it.

Is this a 'Ruby' issue?  Isn't this true of any library/class/etc. that
you might use in any language?

Gary Wright