From: Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>
Date: 2006-01-08T14:01:03+09:00
Subject: Re: Ideas on "Why Living Dangerous can be A Good Thing" in Ruby?

On 1/7/06, Gregory Seidman <gsslist+ruby@anthropohedron.net> wrote:

> I'm not clear on what openness we're talking about. Do you mean one or more
> of the following:

> 3) duck typing allows unintended objects to be used in unintended ways
>
> 4) the ability to add/replace methods in existing classes allows library
>    internals to be inspected or modified

These two.

Which are considered as features by most, but often as vulnerabilities
by outsiders :)