From: Logan Capaldo <logancapaldo@...>
Date: 2006-01-05T07:45:41+09:00
Subject: Re: Potential RCR: method_missing convention, opinions?

--Apple-Mail-5--806267700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=US-ASCII;
	delsp=yes;
	format=flowed


On Jan 4, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Jim Weirich wrote:

>   def respond_to?(sym)
>     replacement_lambda(sym) || original_respond_to?(sym)
>   end
> end

Minor suggestion, I would flip that around, since it would probably  
A) be faster in the common case and B) consistent with current  
behavior. (If you call a method that something #respond_to?s  why are  
you gonna go through the extra dynamic dispatch.)

Other than that, I like how you managed to keep it backwards  
compatible and in pure ruby no less.


--Apple-Mail-5--806267700--